UN fails to reach agreement to extend Taliban travel ban waiver |  News

UN fails to reach agreement to extend Taliban travel ban waiver | News

The US proposes reimposing the travel ban on seven of 13 Taliban members, and conserving the exemption for six others.

A United Nations waiver permitting 13 Afghan officers to travel overseas expired on Friday, because the Security Council failed to reach an agreement on whether or not to extend the travel exemptions.

China and Russia have referred to as for an extension, whereas the United States and Western nations have sought a decreased record of Taliban officers allowed to travel to protest towards the Taliban’s rollback of ladies’s rights and failure to type an inclusive authorities because it promised.

Under a 2011 UN Security Council decision, 135 officers are topic to sanctions that embrace asset freezes and travel bans. But 13 of them had been granted exemptions from the travel ban to enable them to meet officers from different international locations overseas for peace talks.

In June, the 15-member UN Security Council’s Afghanistan Sanctions Committee eliminated two Taliban training ministers from the exemption record over the regime’s curtailment of ladies’s rights.

At the identical time, they renewed the exemption for the others till August 19, plus an extra month if no member objected.

If no member of the council objects to the travel ban by Monday afternoon, it’ll come into power for 3 months.

The US on Thursday proposed reimposing the travel ban on seven of the 13 Taliban officers and conserving the exemption for six others, however limiting their travel solely to Qatar, the place US-Taliban talks have taken place, council diplomats mentioned.

A rival proposal

Reporting from the UN headquarters in New York, Al Jazeera’s Kristen Saloomey mentioned that China, backed by Russia, has argued that the travel ban exemptions are “as obligatory as ever”.

Russia and China made a rival proposal that every one 13 officers be granted travel exemptions for 90 days, however solely to go to Russia, China, Qatar and “regional international locations,” the diplomats mentioned.

Russia and China objected to the US proposal, the diplomats mentioned, and the United Kingdom, France and Ireland opposed the Russia-China proposal, insisting that the exemption can not for all 13 officers as a result of the Taliban’s lack of progress on assembly its commitments on ladies, forming an inclusive authorities and different points.

A spokesperson for the Chinese mission on the UN, which at present holds the rotating presidency week of the Security Council, this referred to as the Western place linking the travel ban human rights “counterproductive”.

The exemptions are “wanted as a lot as ever,” the spokesperson mentioned, including that if reimposing a travel ban is all different members of the council need to do, “clearly they’ve discovered no classes in any respect.”

‘Engagement with Taliban wanted’

Speaking from Washington, DC, former Afghan ambassador to France and Canada, Omar Samad, informed Al Jazeera that engagement with the Taliban is required to assist the Afghan folks.

“China and Russia are pushing for a continuation of the exemptions and even extending it to others, whereas others need them eliminated as a result of they assume the Taliban has not come by way of with a few of their commitments,” mentioned Samad.

On Friday afternoon, diplomats mentioned, the US revised its proposal which might ban travel for seven of the officers and maintain the travel waivers for six others for 90 days with no geographic limits.

Russia and China are actually contemplating that proposal.

Since the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan on August 15, 2021, as many as 700 folks have been killed and 1,400 wounded although safety on the entire has improved, in accordance to a report final month by the UN political mission in Afghanistan.

It highlighted how ladies have been stripped of a lot of their human rights, barred from secondary training and subjected to restrictions on their actions.

.

Leave a Reply